LETTERS, ABSTRACTS, SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
De Groot AC, Bruijnzeel DP. Kathon CG. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:189-190
De Groot AC, Nater JP, Herxheimer A. Minoxidil for male pattern baldness. The Lancet 1987;ii:563
De Groot AC, Bos JD, Bruijnzeel DP. Study of the interaction of Kathon CG- Germall II in hydrophilic creams. Int J Cosm Science 1987;9:249-250
De Groot AC, Bruijnzeel DP, Van der Schroeff JG, Bos JD. Routine testing with the preservative system Kathon CG. Int J Cosm Science 1988;10:47-51
De Groot AC. Kathon CG and cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:206-207
De Groot AC. Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: an updated review. Amer J Contact Dermatitis 1990;1:259-260
De Groot AC, Eshuis H, Stricker BHCh. Oral contraceptives and antibiotics in acne. Brit J Dermatol 1991;124:212
De Groot AC, van Ginkel CJW, Weijland JW. How to detect sensitization to Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:373-374
De Groot AC. PVP/hexadecene copolymer: a hard-to find allergen in modern times. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:172
De Groot AC, Maibach HI. Reply to Letter: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by durable-press finishes does exist in the USA. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63:234-235
De Groot AC. Chemicals found in poplar-type propolis. Dermatitis 2014;25:280
De Groot AC, Schmidt E. Qualitative and quantitative composition of essential oils. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2016;82:189
SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS AND ABSTRACTS
De Groot AC. Childhood dermatomyositis. Brit J Dermatol 1980;102:478
De Groot AC. Kathon CG: risk of sensitization.J Appl Cosmetol 1987;5:70
De Groot AC, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Adverse effects of cosmetics: a survey among clients of beauticians. J Appl Cosmetol 1987;5:104
De Groot AC. Kathon CG allergy: practical information for the dermatologist and the patient. Brit J Dermatol 1989;121:522-523
De Groot AC, Conemans JMH. Contact allergy from mitomycin C after intravesical instillation. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:263-264
De Groot AC. Contact allergy to cosmetics. In: E Panconesi, Ed. Dermatology in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991:384-386
De Groot AC. Nystatin allergy: petrolatum is not the optimal vehicle for patch testing. In: E Panconesi, Ed. Dermatology in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991:752
De Groot AC. The prevalence of contact allergy in atopic patients. In: E Panconesi, Ed. Dermatology in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991:704
Sigurdsson V, De Wit RFE, de Groot AC. Infantile acne.Br J Dermatol 1991;125:285
Hulsmans R-FHJ, Lucker GPH, van der Kleij AMJ, de Groot AC. Kathon CG und Methyldibromglutaronitril: wichtige Kontaktallergene bei Patienten mit Perianalekzem. 18e Coloproktologie-Tage, Bad Homburg, 6-8 March 1992
De Groot AC. Fragrances as a cause of contact dermatitis in cosmetics. Clinical aspects and epidemiological data. Jadassohn Centenary Congress, London, UK, 9-12 October 1996. Book of Abstracts, p. 4 (nr. 9)
De Groot AC. Adverse reactions to fragrances: their less ‘rosy’ side. Intensive course in Dermato-Cosmetic Sciences. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1997:184-194
De Groot AC. Clinical relevance of contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 1999;12(suppl.2):S69